RISK ASSESSMENT PLATFORM
Our approach to implementation
At Arctic, we recognise that every client and every business-wide financial crime risk assessment engagement is different - there is no one-size-fits all, but in our experience, there are common phases and implementation activities which we’ve outlined below.
Most of our clients work directly with us but others prefer to engage the services of risk consultants (who we also partner with) to support the planning, configuration and execution process and our team is adept with either approach, depending on our clients preferred delivery model.
The diagram below represents the “typical” steps that are involved in preparing to undertake a financial crime risk assessment (FCRA) framework and methodology review, configuration of the platform and the steps that are often involved in conducting the assessment, documenting report outcomes, and documenting any actions and follow-on activities. The timing and steps can vary and is meant as an illustration of what a typical engagement may look like.
Step 1- Mobilisation and Kick-off
Step 2 – Current State Assessment
This step is optional and typically conducted by risk consultants when engaged to conduct a financial crime risk assessment review and capability uplift, whereas other clients seek to leverage our expert-developed risk and control modules to improve their current approaches rather than doing a current state vs. target state review.
We’ve described the activities that are typically conducted when a financial crime risk assessment uplift is required.